In the hope
of lightening the mood compared with my previous post, and indeed with the
increasing darkness of the current news agenda, today I offer something
completely different. At the risk of slight personal embarrassment I want to
share with readers of this blog some things I have written for a very different
blog, namely the World of Blyton. This is one of a number of sites devoted to
the life and work of the British children’s author Enid Blyton.
Although sometimes
derided for her writing skills and criticised for her sexist, racist and
classist descriptions, Blyton was the best-selling children’s author of the twentieth
century and is still the all-time eighth best-selling writer of fiction. Anyway, I’m not
particularly concerned to try to defend or attack her reputation. For me, it’s
mainly just that I read her books as a child and so they retain a cosy and
comforting feel. In this way they are indeed an antidote to and escape from
current events. For that matter, I find a certain magic in re-reading many
other authors I read as a child. And, more generally, I think that re-reading
is underrated. I routinely re-read novels (less so non-fiction) and gain much
from it. Occasionally, with really special books, I re-read them immediately I
finish them, a recent example being Allan Massie’s stunning moral meditation A Question of Loyalties. Some novels, such as those of C.P. Snow, I have read perhaps a couple of hundred times without tiring of them.
Anyway, back
to Blyton. On my World Of Blyton contributor page you will find some eleven posts written
between 2014 and 2015. Most are book reviews, one explains why I love
re-reading her work, one is about how reading her books in translation has
helped me learn French and one – my favourite – is a silly joke that I can’t begin
to summarise here.
Is there any
connection to organization studies? Well, yes there is. Some years ago I wrote
a book chapter (Grey, 1998) about the ways that organization is represented in
traditional children’s literature. I focussed on three series of books: Arthur
Ransome’s Swallows and Amazons
series, Anthony Buckeridge’s Jennings
series and Enid Blyton’s Famous Five
series. It has sunk almost without trace, but the argument was that such books
are an aspect in socializing children into how the organizational world works.
In the case of the Famous Five series,
I suggested that it offered a template of the patriarchal group.
I think that
there is some mileage in that argument, but the truth, of course, is that I
wrote the chapter as a way of writing about some books that I loved, just as I did for Snow's novels (Grey, 1996), academic journals being more forgiving in those days. I also
love, and occasionally re-read, the works of P.G. Wodehouse, of which in 1961
Evelyn Waugh said: “Mr. Wodehouse's idyllic world can never stale. He will continue to release future generations from captivity that may be more irksome than our own. He has made a world for us to live in and delight in”.
That
sentiment captures my own feeling about Wodehouse, and Blyton and all the others. Escapist it may
be, but from time to time as the guns fire and the bombs explode a little escapism is nothing to be ashamed of.
References
Grey, C. (1996) 'C.P. Snow's Fictional Sociology of Management and Organizations', Organization 3 (1): 61-83.
Grey, C.
(1998) ‘Child’s Play: Representations of Organization in Children’s Literature’
in Hassard, J. & Holliday, R. (eds) Organization/Representation:
Work and Organizations in Popular Culture. London: Routledge, pp. 131-148
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.